Legal Opinion
Mayberry v. Gaddis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 6, 1923No. 13332PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
The plaintiffs in error filed this action in the distinct court of Washington county to enjoin the issuance of $700,000 of road and bridge bonds. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and plaintiffs have prosecuted their appeal to this court. The trial' court made special findings of fact and conclusions of law and we have exámined the record and find that the findings of fact are supported by the evidence.. We shall now consider the various objections •made to the conclusions of law.
The notice of the time and place where the special election to vote on the bond issue would be held was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Martin v. McGarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Dunagan v. Town of Red RockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lamb v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Mitsler v. EyeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Green v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Allen v. Board of Com'rs of Logan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Garrett v. LondonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.