Legal Opinion

Garrett v. London

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1924No. 15859PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto brought to contest the nomination to the office of sheriff of Carter county, obtained by the defendant in error at the Democratic primary held on fhe 5th day of August, 1924. The parties stand here as they stood in the trial court, and will be designated as plaintiff and defendant.

Plaintiff in his amended petition claims that he and defendant were candidates on the Democratic ticket for the office of sheriff at the primary election and that the votes cast at said election have been duly canvassed and the election board has declared defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennington v. HareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Miller v. Town of PalermoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Martin v. McGarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Mayberry v. GaddisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Wagoner County Election Board v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. O'Brien v. GassowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Jackson v. OrendorffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Wagoner County Election Board v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API