Legal Opinion

United States v. Leung Tak Lun, Chico Wong, and Andrew Wong

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1991No. 90-10510 to 90-10512PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, District Judge:

This heroin importation and possession trial was the first time the People’s Republic of China and the United States joined to investigate and prosecute a criminal offense. It ended disastrously. The district court granted a defense mistrial motion after a government witness changed his story and other witnesses left the country. Defendants now appeal the denial of their motion to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds. We hold the defendants have failed to show the conduct leading to the mistrial motion was intended to provoke them into moving for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Chan Walker Zielie, Keith H. Gustafson, Thomas David Wilkerson, Robert Walter Govern, and Leon D. MausserCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Hirsch HorodnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Bryson Jose Roberto A. MiguelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Stephen SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Theodore A. Weston v. Peg Kernan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API