Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Hirsch Horodner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1993No. 92-55187PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Mark Hirsch Horodner appeals the district court’s denial of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2265.
In 1987, Horodner bought a shotgun. It didn’t work properly so he took it back to the dealer to have it repaired. He was subsequently charged and convicted of two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). One count was predicated on his possession when he bought the shotgun. The other was for his possession ten days later when he picked it up after it had been repaired. For these two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. $292,888.04 in U.S. Currency, Calvin L. Robinson, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- John Castellanos v. United States of America, Kevin B. Streete v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Thomas L. Ludwig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. John D. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert Rolando GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.