Legal Opinion
Rizzuto v. National Reserve Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 1949No. Civ. No. 13882PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
Appellants sued to recover a fire loss of $1,839.48, on an insurance policy written by respondent. Judgment, entered on the findings, was in favor of the insurer for its costs, and this appeal was taken.
Appellants own a frame store building in San Jose. On July 4, 1945, respondent issued the policy in suit covering the property for $2,600 “while occupied only for barber shop purposes.” Appellant Louis Rizzuto is a barber and his shop is in the southerly half of the store. Appellants rented the northerly half to one Herman Yeager, who occupied it as a pick-up cleaning shop. At the time of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Allen v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Mawhinney v. Southern InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Steil v. Sun Insurance OfficeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Merchants Fire Assurance Corporation v. Ann E. LattimoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Century-National Insurance v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Morgan Stivers v. National American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Stivers v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Linda Taylor v. Garrison Property and CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.