Legal Opinion

Mawhinney v. Southern Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1893No. 14763PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

— The defendant made its policy of insurance in favor of the plaintiff’s assignor, by which it insured him to an amount not exceeding eight hundred dollars for the term of three months from June 2,1890, against loss or damage by fire to the following described property, “while located and contained as described herein, and not elsewhere, to wit:—■

“Threshing outfit in the field.
“Eight hundred dollars on one combined harvester complete, all while owned by assured and known as Barrett’s harvesting machine and outfit, and operating in the grain fields and in transit from place to place in…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Koshland v. Columbia InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. British-America Assurance Co. v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Allen v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. People v. Selby Smelting and Lead Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API