Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of James H. Casey
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 12, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7718PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1 through 6 of appellant's application 1 entitled "Brush Fed Tape Dispenser." Claims 7 and 8 were allowed.
The claimed invention relates to a machine for dispensing adhesive tape.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A taping machine comprising a supporting structure, a brush attached to said supporting structure, said brush being formed with projecting bristles which terminate in free ends to collectively define a surface to which adhesive tape will detachably adhere, and means for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans BehmenburgCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of RishoiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of Warren R. AttwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Victor A. J. Van Lint and Park H. Miller, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1994