Legal Opinion

Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1917No. Civ. No. 2149PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

That the evidence shows, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence is the only point raised upon this appeal from a judgment, entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury in the sum of one thousand dollars, as damages for personal injuries resulting to the plaintiff from a collision, occurring in the city of Oakland, between a taxicab, which the plaintiff was driving, and an electric train operated by the defendants.

Appellants concede, for the purposes of this appeal, that defendants were guilty of negligence, in that, on the night of, and at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gregg v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. New York Lubricating Oil Co. v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Lloyd v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API