Robinson v. Coughlin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether a transferee of fraudulently transferred assets may be required to pay damages under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), General Statutes § 52-552a et seq., when the transferee reconveys those assets to the transferor and there is no claim that the assets depreciated in value between the time of the fraudulent transfer and the time of the reconveyance. We conclude that a transferee may not be held hable for damages under such circumstances. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Derderian v. DerderianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Hall v. Arthur Young & Co. (In Re Computer Universe, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1986
- Davis v. Davenport (In Re Davenport)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
3Cited by23 opinions
- Foisie v. Worcester Polytechnic Inst.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. CoopermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Dfs Secured Healthcare Receivables Trust v. Caregivers Great Lakes, Inc. And Marc LeestmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Titan Real Estate Ventures, LLC v. MJCC Realty LP (In Re Flanagan)District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.