Legal Opinion
Mountz v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 14, 1978No. Appeal, No. 2173 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
Carl I. Mountz has appealed from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dated December 2, 1976 which affirmed a referee’s decision that the claimant had failed to establish that his *585disability was tbe result of an occupational disease within the meaning of Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §411.
Claimant was employed for approximately 15 years as an iron ore miner for the Bethlehem Steel Corporation. Because of a respiratory ailment, he terminated that employment on May…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bullock v. Building Maintenance, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Smith v. Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Unity Builders, Inc. v. CommowealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Frank Irey, Jr., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Stegner v. Canterbury Coal Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Shops v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Byrd v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.