Legal Opinion

Shops v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1982No. Appeals, Nos. 638 C.D. 1981 and 749 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This protracted workmen’s compensation litigation has its origin in injuries .sustained by Albert Reichard on July 6, 1971, while he was performing the duties of his employment as a welder with Martin N. Hoover Shops. On that date the claimant was engaged in propagating a weld when an open can of paint thinner, apparently left in the area by a co-worker, was ignited spraying Mr. Reichard with flaming liquid and causing him to suffer second and third degree burns over sixty per cent of his body. In the course of attempting to extinguish the flames, the claimant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fehr v. YMCA, PottsvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Guzik v. Laurel Ridge Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Lord v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Cambria County Commissioners v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Patterson v. Philadelphia Dairy Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mrs. Smith's Frozen Foods Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Glinka v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API