Hutzler v. McDonnell

The plaintiff contends that the court erred: (1) In finding that defendant was not negligent as to lookout; (2) in finding that defendant was not negligent as to management and control of his car; (3) in finding that plain tiff assumed the risk incident to defendant’s management and control of the car; and (4) in granting defendant’s'motion for a nonsuit.

The material facts are not in dispute. In brief, they are as follows: On the afternoon of November 16, • 1940, Mr. McDonnell invited plaintiff to accompany him and one John White on an auto trip to' Winona, Minnesota, in the evening of said…