Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2009No. 2009-0364Published

1DissentO’Connor, J.

{¶ 21} I dissent from the court’s decision to dismiss this appeal as having been improvidently accepted. ■ Because it is uncontroverted that appellee, Darnell Jones, did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the room searched and because he had abandoned the property before the search took place, I would reverse the decision of the court of appeals and reinstate the trial court’s decision denying the motion to suppress.

*1207Factual Background

{¶ 22} On January 18, 2007, two city of Dayton police officers on routine patrol observed a green Mercury Sable make an abrupt turn into a motel…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API