Legal Opinion
Retail Digital Network v. Ramona Prieto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 14, 2017No. 13-56069PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Chief Judge THOMAS
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider Plaintiff-Appellant Retail Digital Network, LLC’s (“RDN”) First Amendment challenge to California Business and Professions Code § 25503(f)-(h). Section 25503(f)-(h) prohibits alcohol manufacturers and wholesalers from providing anything of value to retailers in exchange for advertising their alcohol products. As a result of Section 25503(f) — Ch), alcohol manufacturers and wholesalers refused to enter into advertising agreements with RDN — which placed advertisements in wine and spirit retail stores — and RDN…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Discount Tobacco City & Lottery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- King v. Governor of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Actmedia, Inc. v. StrohCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- John Doe v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Italian Colors Restaurant v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Vugo, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Nicopure Labs, LLC v. Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Pacific Coast Horseshoeing v. Kimberly KirchmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.