Legal Opinion

Vugo, Inc. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 16, 2019No. Docket 18-807; August Term, 2018PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Katzmann, Chief Judge:

This appeal concerns a First Amendment challenge to nearly twenty-year-old New York City rules that ban advertisements in for-hire vehicles ("FHVs") absent authorization from the Taxi and Limousine Commission (the "TLC" or the "City"). See 35 R.C.N.Y. §§ 59A-29(e)(1), 59B-29(e)(1). A similar rule has applied to yellow and green taxicabs (collectively, "taxicabs," "taxis," or "cabs") for over two decades. See 35 R.C.N.Y. § 58-32(f). The TLC originally enacted these bans because, as the record reflects, passengers find in-ride advertisements-particularly, as relevant here,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Aptive Environmental v. Town of Castle RockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Sullivan v. Nassau County Interim Finance AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  3. Steven Recht v. Patrick MorriseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  4. The Art & Antique Dealers League of Am., Inc. v. SeggosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  5. ACA CONNECTS - AMERICA'S COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION v. FREYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API