Vugo, Inc. v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Katzmann, Chief Judge:
This appeal concerns a First Amendment challenge to nearly twenty-year-old New York City rules that ban advertisements in for-hire vehicles ("FHVs") absent authorization from the Taxi and Limousine Commission (the "TLC" or the "City"). See 35 R.C.N.Y. §§ 59A-29(e)(1), 59B-29(e)(1). A similar rule has applied to yellow and green taxicabs (collectively, "taxicabs," "taxis," or "cabs") for over two decades. See 35 R.C.N.Y. § 58-32(f). The TLC originally enacted these bans because, as the record reflects, passengers find in-ride advertisements-particularly, as relevant here,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Aptive Environmental v. Town of Castle RockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Sullivan v. Nassau County Interim Finance AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Steven Recht v. Patrick MorriseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- The Art & Antique Dealers League of Am., Inc. v. SeggosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- ACA CONNECTS - AMERICA'S COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION v. FREYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.