Legal Opinion
Rudy Pavlik Andy Pavlik Thomas H. Schmidt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1991No. 91-35116PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
. TANG, Circuit Judge:
Rudy Pavlik, Andy Pavlik, and Thomas Schmidt (“the Pavliks”) appeal the district court’s judgment affirming civil penalties imposed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) for violating the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (“the Halibut Act”). Specifically, NOAA charged the Pavliks with possessing halibut out of season, in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 773e(a)(5). An administrative law judge found that the Pavliks had violated the Halibut Act and assessed civil penalties against each of them. The Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fowler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Boatner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Charles H. Henderson v. Federal Aviation Administration National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Sierra Pacific IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Gonzalez v. PruntyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.