Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tustin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 2005PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, William Tustin, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Huntingdon County Court of Common Pleas, following his guilty plea to driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”) at the “highest rate of alcohol.”1 Appellant asks us to consider whether the trial court erred by applying the new ten-year “look-back” period of Section 8806(b) of the Vehicle Code, and not the now-repealed Section 3781(e) seven-year “look-back” period in effect at the time of Appellant’s prior DUI conviction. We hold the trial court properly sentenced Appellant under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Commonwealth v. HeinbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. PlegerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. McKownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API