Commonwealth v. Pleger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
COLVILLE, J.:
¶ 1 These cases are cross-appeals from judgment of sentence. At No. 1012 WDA 2006, Dean Pleger is the appellant. In that appeal, he has not filed a brief to this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss that appeal.
¶2 At No. 1146 WDA 2006, the Commonwealth appeals, contending that Pleger’s sentence is illegal. For the reasons that follow, we dispose of this appeal by vacating the judgment of sentence and remanding for re-sentencing. Because the following analysis involves only the Com monwealth’s appeal, we will henceforth refer to Pleger as Appellee.
Facts
¶ 3 In 1996, Appellee…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In the Interest of M.W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FuquaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. CookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. B.D.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. AtanasioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.