Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pleger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 2007PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

¶ 1 These cases are cross-appeals from judgment of sentence. At No. 1012 WDA 2006, Dean Pleger is the appellant. In that appeal, he has not filed a brief to this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss that appeal.

¶2 At No. 1146 WDA 2006, the Commonwealth appeals, contending that Pleger’s sentence is illegal. For the reasons that follow, we dispose of this appeal by vacating the judgment of sentence and remanding for re-sentencing. Because the following analysis involves only the Com monwealth’s appeal, we will henceforth refer to Pleger as Appellee.

Facts

¶ 3 In 1996, Appellee…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Interest of M.W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. FuquaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. CookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. B.D.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. AtanasioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API