Legal Opinion
Cwynar v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 2001No. A089841PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, J.
I. Introduction
Proposition G is a San Francisco ordinance that restricts a property owner’s ability to evict a tenant from a residential rental unit so that the unit can be used as a residence by the owner or a close family member. Several property owners and three associations (plaintiffs) sued the City and County of San Francisco (the City) and others alleging, among other things, that Proposition G is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to them.
The superior court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend as to each of the causes of action challenging the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Herzberg v. County of PlumasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Massingill v. Department of Food & AgricultureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Tom v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Garber v. LevitAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.