Legal Opinion

Garber v. Levit

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided June 13, 2006No. 613808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*Supp. 3Opinion

THE COURT*

Appellant -and landlord Leslie A. Garber appeals from the trial court’s mling granting respondent and tenant Julianne Jones Levit’s motion to quash service of summons. The underlying residential unlawful detainer action is based on a notice to terminate tenancy under San Francisco Administrative Code chapter 37 (Rent Ordinance), section 37.9 subdivision (a)(8), also known as the “owner move-in” provision. Appellant contends the trial court erred in granting the motion to quash and holding that section 37.9 subdivision (a)(8) (hereafter section 37.9(a)(8)), as amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. PARKOWNERS ASS'N v. City of MontclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Carlton Santee Corp. v. Padre Dam Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. WeatherillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Delta Imports, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Naylor v. Superior Court of the City & County of San FranciscoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
  2. Garber v. LevitCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Stancil v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Stancil v. Super.Ct.California Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API