U.S. Home Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
28 U.S.C. § 1500 (2006); United States v. Tohono O’odham Nation, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1723, 179 L.Ed.2d 723 (2011); Substantially the Same Operative Facts in Suit Pending Before a District Court.
OPINION
Bush, Judge.
This suit, originally filed February 3, 2009, seeks money damages for hazardous waste contamination of land sold by the United States to plaintiffs. In an earlier opinion, the court dismissed Counts II and III of the eomplaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because these counts were not founded on a money-mandating statute. U.S. Home Corp. v. United States, 92 Fed.Cl. 401,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Ministerio Roca Solida v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Beberman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.