Legal Opinion
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 8, 2013No. 00-512LPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judicial takings claim; Motion for reconsideration under RCFC 54(b) and 59(a)(1); Standard for reconsideration; Central Pines — application of 28 U.S.C. § 1500 to supplemental complaint under RCFC 15(d); Central Pines distinguishable from ease involving supplemental complaint that raises entirely new claim; Motion denied.
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
On May 2, 2012, this court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the “judicial takings” claim alleged in plaintiff Petro-Hunt’s supplemental complaint. See Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States, 105 Fed.Cl. 37 (2012). On October 18, 2012, defendant filed a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Intergraph Corporation v. Intel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Vasko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013