Legal Opinion

Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 11, 2014No. 1:11-cv-00658PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

This is an action for damages brought by the Skokomish Indian Tribe (the Tribe), as well as the individual members of the Tribe, deriving from the construction and operation of the Cushman Hydroelectric Project, upstream from the Tribe’s reservation. Plaintiffs allege that defendant failed to protect their interests with respect to the licensing and operation of the hydroelectric project, thereby violating its obligations arising under a treaty as well as various statutes. Plaintiffs further aver that defendant’s actions effectuated a temporary takings under the Fifth…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Associated Mortgage Bankers Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Solenex, LLC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API