Legal Opinion
Edo Corp. v. Newark Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 22, 1995No. Civ. H-90-951(AHN)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NEVAS, District Judge.
Plaintiff EDO Corporation (“EDO”) commenced this declaratory judgment action against its primary insurers, Newark Insur-anee Co. (“Newark”) and Aetna Insurance Company (“Aetna”), and against excess insurers, Burnhope and Companies (“Burn-hope”) and American Insurance Company (“American”) (collectively, “the insurers”), seeking a declaration that it is entitled to insurance coverage for expenditures it incurred in connection with environmental contamination.
Familiarity with the court’s previous ruling interpreting and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stamford Wallpaper Company, Inc. v. Tig InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. CicconeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Stamford Wallpaper Co. v. TIG InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- W.C. Richards Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.