Legal Opinion

Giese v. Giese

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2002No. 20020168PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert Giese appealed from orders of the district court denying his demand for a change of judge, granting Eva Giese’s motion to enforce a prior judgment dividing Robert’s retirement account between the parties, denying Robert’s request for reconsideration of the issue, and denying Robert’s motion for attorney fees. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Robert and Eva Giese were divorced on March 26, 1998, after a long: term marriage. The divorce decree awarded Eva twenty percent of Robert’s employee retirement account and directed Robert’s attorney to prepare an appropriate order to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Traynor v. LeclercNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Berg v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Matrix Properties Corp. v. TAG INVESTMENTSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bertsch v. DuemelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Amsbaugh v. AmsbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bladow v. BladowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Giese v. GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sauter v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API