Berg v. Berg
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Weston Berg appealed from an order amending an original divorce decree, following this Court’s remand on a prior appeal. We hold the trial court’s findings of fact, as supplemented, are not clearly erroneous and they support the court’s award of unsupervised visitation to Brenda Berg. We hold the court’s directive that Weston Berg pay for the children’s health insurance coverage is not in accordance with our statutory law. We further hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of attorney fees to Weston Berg for the prior appeal. The order…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zuger v. ZugerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Stoppler v. StopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Schiff v. SchiffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Ackerman v. AckermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Berg v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Schmidt v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Wigginton v. WiggintonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Negaard v. NegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Giese v. GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.