Legal Opinion
Tucson Unified School District v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1993No. CV-92-0188-CQPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff Tucson Unified School District (TUSD or district) filed a complaint in the United States District Court in Tucson alleging that various defendants were liable to it for the cost of removing asbestos products from 81 of the district’s buildings. TUSD was created pursuant to the Arizona Constitution and statutes for the purpose of providing, in the Tucson area, a public school system as required by the state’s constitution. In their answer, various defendants (Owens) claimed that TUSD was barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Mellinger v. City of Houston (Tex. 1-18-1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
- Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Dickey Ex Rel. Dickey v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Spooner v. PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Mayer Unified School District v. WinklemanArizona Supreme Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.