Legal Opinion

Booth v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 31, 2004No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0097PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, J.

¶ 1 In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the trial court erred in allowing a jury to determine that the state negligently had failed to prevent elk from entering portions of Interstate 40 (1-40) just east of Flagstaff. Based on the particular facts presented in this case, we conclude that the issue was properly presented to the jury and affirm the judgment entered below.

¶2 In December 1998, Jerry Booth was severely injured when the car he was driving collided with an elk lying in the roadway on 1-40 near milepost 211. He sued the state on his own behalf and that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Strawberry Water Co. v. PaulsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. St. Joseph's Hosp. v. CowartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Belhumeur v. ZilmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. LANDINGS ASS'N, INC. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Quinn v. CardenasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API