Legal Opinion
Perfect Pearl Co. v. Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 14, 2012No. 10 Civ. 3998(PAE)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Perfect Pearl Co. (“Perfect”) brings claims of unfair competition and false advertising against defendant Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc. (“Majestic”), under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., and New York common law. It alleges that Majestic has infringed on its exclusive right to use the trademarks MAJESTIC and MAJESTIC PEARL (the “MAJESTIC marks” or the “marks”). Majestic has counterclaimed, asserting that it is the rightful owner of the MAJESTIC marks and that Perfect has infringed on its trademark rights.
*524Both parties now…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Fischer v. ForrestDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Coach, Inc. v. Horizon Trading USA Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- A.V.E.L.A., INC. v. Estate of Marilyn Monroe, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Van Praagh v. GrattonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.