Legal Opinion

Moore v. State Finance Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment, based upon a verdict, in the amount of $398.22 which the circuit court entered in favor of the plaintiff. The action was instituted by the plaintiff' to recover the reasonable value of plumbing material and labor which the plaintiff, according to his complaint, supplied upon the order of the defendant.

The defendant-appellant submits three assignments of error which read as follows:

“The Court erred in admitting in evidence respondent’s Exhibits A and B, the same being ledger sheets.”
“The Court erred in denying appellant’s motion for an order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Eilertsen v. WEBEROregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sneider v. Big Horn Milling Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Haygood v. Clark Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Douglas v. Parker Commercial Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knappton Towboat Co. v. ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Bastian v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bucholz v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API