Haygood v. Clark Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Troup superior court — Judge Terrell. December 27, 1920.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
1. The second, fourth, and fifth grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of testimony, are not approved as true by the trial judge, without qualification. A lengthy note is added to these grounds, fully setting out what appear to be material qualifications of the grounds as presented by the movant. Even express approval with added qualifications is not an unqualified approval of the grounds as true, and therefore these grounds do not present any question for the consideration of this court McLean v. Mann, 148 Ga. 114 (95 S. E. 985); L. & N. R. Co.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tifton, Thomasville & Gulf Railway Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- McLean v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Bush v. FourcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Griggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Collier v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Moore v. State Finance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Herbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.