Legal Opinion

Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

— On January 2, 1903, the state of Idaho and the Twin Falls Land & Water Company entered into a contract by which the latter was to construct an irrigation project for the irrigation of certain lands under the Carey Act (U. S. Comp. Stats., sec. 4685) by means of 3,400 second-feet of the waters of Snake River appropriated for that purpose. The lands so proposed to be irrigated were partly on the north side and partly on the south side of Snake River. Thereafter a corporation known as the North Side Twin Falls Land & Water Co. (hereinafter *76designated as the Construction Co.) acquired the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Twin Falls-Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Adams v. Twin Falls-Oakley Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Tapper v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of EmmettIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. North Side Canal Co. v. Idaho Farms Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fullmer v. ProctorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Quinlan v. PearsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API