Legal Opinion

Quinlan v. Pearson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1950No. 7673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Respondent, plaintiff below, brought this action seeking to quiet title to an undivided one-half interest in Lot five, Block three, O’Callaghan’s Acre Tracts of the Village of Bonners Ferry. The plaintiff and the defendant Harry H. Pearson were married on or about the 18th day of October, 1908. In 1914 or 1915, while they were living together as husband and wife, the husband bought the lot above described from one O’Callaghan for $300.00 on an installment contract, payable $10.00 per month. Thereafter, a small house was built on the property, presumably with community funds or…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chapin v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hopkins v. Idaho State University Credit Union (In Re Herter)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2011
  3. McDonald v. BarlowIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Hopkins v. Idaho State University Credit Union (In Re Herter)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2011
  5. McDonald v. BarlowIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API