Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co., Ltd.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
A history of this case and the issues are set forth in Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co., 38 Ida. 73, 223 Pac. 1072, wherein the court reversed and remanded the ease for the trial court to find whether there was any surplus storage water, holding that if there was, appellant and his class would be entitled to their pro rata share.
The principal point in the appeal herein is that the trial court, instead of making specific findings on the question of surplus, set forth a conclusion that there was no surplus. A specific finding should have been made but since it was not, if the facts show that no…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Steve v. Bonners Ferry Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Wood v. BrodersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Appeal From the Department of ReclamationIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Creem v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Henderson v. Twin Falis CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- North Side Canal Co. v. Idaho Farms Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Shrum v. WakimotoIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.