Sagonowsky v. More
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
This case arising out of a real estate dispute raises the novel claim of whether an award made in a commercial contractual arbitration can form the basis for a subsequent action for malicious prosecution. We hold in the circumstances presented by this case that it cannot.
In January 1991 plaintiff Christina M. Sagonowsky bought a four-unit apartment in San Francisco. The contract of sale contained a clause providing for commercial arbitration. In April Sagonowsky entered into a tenancy in common agreement with plaintiff Curtis Kekoa, Jr. (her then fiancé), plaintiff Stefan M.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Brennan v. Tremco Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Staffpro, Inc. v. Elite Show Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Jackson v. YarbrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Lanz v. GoldstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.