Legal Opinion

Sagonowsky v. More

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1998No. A078201, A078305PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, J.

This case arising out of a real estate dispute raises the novel claim of whether an award made in a commercial contractual arbitration can form the basis for a subsequent action for malicious prosecution. We hold in the circumstances presented by this case that it cannot.

In January 1991 plaintiff Christina M. Sagonowsky bought a four-unit apartment in San Francisco. The contract of sale contained a clause providing for commercial arbitration. In April Sagonowsky entered into a tenancy in common agreement with plaintiff Curtis Kekoa, Jr. (her then fiancé), plaintiff Stefan M.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brennan v. Tremco Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Staffpro, Inc. v. Elite Show Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Jackson v. YarbrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Lanz v. GoldstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API