Brennan v. Tremco Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
We granted review to decide whether a person may sue for the malicious prosecution of an action that the parties resolved through contractual arbitration. Because a contractual arbitration proceeding does not result in a favorable termination of a prior action, a necessary element of malicious prosecution, we conclude a person may not do so.
I. The Facts and Procedural History
In 1992, Tremco Incorporated (Tremco) sued a former employee, Walter M. Brennan, after he went to work for one of Tremco’s competitors. The *313complaint alleged breach of contract, conversion, misappropriation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Metalclad Corp. v. Ventana Environmental Organizational PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.