Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thacker v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Is tbe plaintiff’s alleged cause of action against tbe defendants barred by tbe statute of limitations, C. S., 439? If this question presented by this appeal is answered in tbe affirmative — as it must be — it is unnecessary for us to discuss or decide whether tbe admitted default of tbe clerk occurred during either of tbe terms covered by tbe bonds executed by tbe defendants.

Tbe clerk of tbe Superior Court is an insurer and guarantor of funds “which have come, or may come, into bis bands by virtue of color of title,” Pasquotank County v. Surety Co., 201 N. C., 325, 160 S. E., 176; Gilmore v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lee v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Smith v. Patton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Gilmore v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Vaughan v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Washington v. . BonnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Page v. SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API