Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Page v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The respondents challenge the correctness of the judgment below on tbe facts agreed, and contend that no liability should attach to the clerk of the Superior Court, or to the surety on his bond, on account of payment to an improper person of funds in the hands of the clerk belonging to an infant when the payment has been directed by an order of the judge of the Superior Court.

On first thought, this contention on the part of the respondents would seem to be based on a reasonable construction of the law governing the clerk’s relation to the court, but, upon a closer examination of the duties…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilmingiton & Weldon Railroad v. KitchinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Tolls v. TollsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel . Bd., Com. of Bladen Co. v. . ClarkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Smith v. Patton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. White v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Hawkins v. M & J Finance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. In re Contempt Proceeding of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Wayne Finance Corp. v. ShivarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API