Legal Opinion

Washington v. . Bonner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The evidence tended to show that chapter 170, section 77 of the Private Laws of 1903 provided for the appointment of a sinking fund commissioner for the city of Washington, and that on 7 April, 1919, F. H. Bryan was duly appointed commissioner of the sinking fund of the plaintiff. On 10 April, 1919, defendant, National Surety Company, executed an indemnity bond on behalf of said Bryan for the faithful performance of his official duties "for a period of one year, beginning 7 April, 1919, and ending on 7 April, 1920, or until his successor is duly elected or appointed and qualified." On 27…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Daniel v. GrizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Daniel v. . GrizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Eller v. . ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Brown v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Commissioners of Moore County v. MacRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Peal v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Speas v. FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Wheeless v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API