Legal Opinion

Hangey, R., et ux. v. Husqvarna Aplts.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2023No. 14 EAP 2022Published

1Opinion of the Court

[J-6-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. RONALD SCOTT HANGEY AND : No. 14 EAP 2022 ROSEMARY HANGEY H/W, : : Appeal from the Judgment of Appellees : Superior Court entered on March 8, : 2021, at No. 3298 EDA 2017 : reversing the Order entered on v. : September 7, 2017, in the Court of : Common Pleas, Philadelphia : County, Civil Division at No. 1015 HUSQVARNA PROFESSIONAL : March Term, 2017. PRODUCTS, INC., HUSQVARNA GROUP, : HUSQVARNA U.S. HOLDING, INC., : ARGUED: March 8, 2023 HUSQVARNA AB, AND TRUMBAUER'S :…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API