Legal Opinion

Prentice v. Roberts

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1959No. Civ. 23186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment for defendants entered on a jury verdict in an action for damages for personal injuries and property damage arising from an intersection collision of automobiles. The issues were made by the complaint and the answer thereto, and by a cross-complaint on the part of defendants and plaintiffs’ answer thereto. The judgment was that plaintiffs take nothing on the complaint and that defendants take nothing on the cross-complaint. Defendants did not appeal from the judgment for plaintiffseross-defendants on the cross-complaint.

The collision occurred…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pacific Finance Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Douglas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Martz v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bridgman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hidden v. MalinoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Fiatarone v. MastersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Kueffer v. SmothersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API