Fiatarone v. Masterson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *
Appellants were the owners of a building in Richmond, California, where they operated an Italian-style restaurant and bar. They leased the property to August Sauer who wished to operate the business as a steak house. Saner informed appellants before the lease was drawn that it would be necessary for him to make numerous alterations in the building and that he could do so at his own expense. Appellants employed respondents, who were attorneys at law, to draw the lease and handle the legal phases of the transaction. It is admitted that appellants were concerned over the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Howard v. WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bellows v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Lockhart v. RiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Medical Transportation Network v. Deloitte & ToucheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998