Legal Opinion

Frank v. Coyle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1944No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 42,834PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff filed this bill of complaint to compel specific performance of a claimed oral agreement whereby the defendant had agreed to remove from plaintiff’s land eight tourist cabins (personal property) which plaintiff had sold to the defendant. At the time the bill of complaint was filed, 10 months after the agreement was entered into, the defendant had not yet removed the ‘cabins. Plaintiff also claimed damages for being deprived of the use of his land on which the cabins stood'. The defendant answered, admitting that he had not removed the cabins, and claiming the agreement was that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Johnson v. DouglasMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Harrington v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Beaver v. ZwonackMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Godwin v. LindbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Reinink v. Van LoozenoordMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Fleischer v. BuccilliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API