Harrington v. City of Port Huron
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
The plaintiff brought an action of ejectment against defendant by filing a declaration as commencement of suit, which contains two counts. The first count described the premises as follows:
“A tract of land bounded on the north-west by Pine Grove park, on the north-east by St. Clair river, and on the south by Lincoln avenue, excelling a strip of land across said premises seventy-five feet in width, occupied by the Port Huron & Northwestern Railway Company, being fifty feet in width on westerly side of the center line of the roadway of said company, and twenty-five feet on the easterly side…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Northern Turnpike Road Co. v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Judd v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1814
- People ex rel. De Forest v. DennistonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SilberwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Frank v. CoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Graham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Ladd v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Rasch v. NothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.