Legal Opinion
Ferruzzo v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 11, 1980No. Civ. 21962PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.
In this writ of mandate proceeding, petitioner is the attorney of record for C & D Enterprises, Inc. in respondent’s case numbers 288459, 289608, and 286975. There is no appearance by either respondent or real party in interest.
In the respondent superior court petitioner, upon noticed motion, moved in each case to be relieved as counsel of record for the corporation (real party in interest) and to be relieved as counsel in two of the cases for individuals apparently connected with the corporation. The grounds consisted of noncooperation and nonpayment of attorney fees.
In…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Laskowitz v. ShellenbergerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Vann v. ShillehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gamet v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Smith v. Microskills San Diego L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Urs Corp. v. Venture, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Van Gundy v. Camelot Resorts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1983
- Mohr, Hackett, Pederson, Blakley, Randolph & Haga, P.C. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.