Legal Opinion

Mohr, Hackett, Pederson, Blakley, Randolph & Haga, P.C. v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 29, 1987No. 1 CA-SA 260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge.

This is a special action review of the trial court’s denial of a law firm’s application to withdraw as counsel of record. One issue is presented: whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the application solely because the firm’s client was a corporation.

The firm submitted an application to withdraw which bore the client’s written approval. No trial date had been set at the time. The trial judge denied the application on the ground that the firm’s client was a corporation.

At the hearing on the firm’s motion for reconsideration, the judge explained that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Laskowitz v. ShellenbergerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  3. Transportes Aereos de Angola v. Ronair, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  4. Anamax Mining Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Ferruzzo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Hopi TribeHopi Appellate Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API