Legal Opinion
Van Gundy v. Camelot Resorts, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided November 30, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 505317PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
OVERTON, J.
In California the rule is clear: with the sole exception of small claims court, a corporation cannot act in propria persona. (Ferruzzo v. Superior Court (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 501, 503 [163 Cal.Rptr. 573].)
I
Here, following an award of $224.90 based upon findings and conclusions of the labor commissioner, plaintiff, through counsel, filed a timely notice of appeal to the proper court. No additional pleadings are required by either plaintiff (the employee) or defendant (employer) Camelot Resorts, Inc. In due course the cause was set for trial de novo in the municipal court;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Irvine National Bank v. Kwang-Wei HanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ferruzzo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gamet v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Woodford Manufacturing Co. v. A.O.Q., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Caressa Camille, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ex Parte Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLCSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2016
- Ex parte Televicentro of Puerto Rico, LLCSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.