Baney v. Eoute
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1 William and Joy Baney (the Baneys) appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint and entering a declaratory judgment in favor of Emily Eoute. The Baneys contend that the trial court erred in finding ambiguity in the language of a document that conveyed an easement from Eoute to the Baneys. The Baneys further contend that the trial court erred in concluding that the use of the easement was limited to the existing roadway rather than the fifty-foot width indicated in the metes and bounds description. After study, we affirm.
¶ 2 In November 1993, the Baneys purchased…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Samuel Rappaport Family Partnership v. Meridian BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Kohn v. KohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Hann v. SaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Porter v. KalasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Fedorko Properties, Inc. v. C.F. Zurn & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
3Cited by45 opinions
- Levitt v. PatrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Profit Wize Marketing v. WiestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Neducsin, D. v. Caplan, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Amerikohl Mining Co. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.