Wiginton v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINIONS AND ORDER
ASHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Costs for Electronic Discovery.1 They argue that Defendant CB Richard Ellis, Inc. (“CBRE”) should bear the costs of searching CBRE’s email backup tapes to find documents containing pornographic terms and images, as well as documents relating to CBRE’s workplace environment generally, due to the large number of these types of documents that have been found in a controlled sampling. CBRE responds that only a small fraction of the emails that have been found contain arguably relevant material…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Rowe Entertainment, Inc. v. William Morris Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- McPeek v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Uppal v. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & ScienceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Ex Parte Vulcan Materials Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. NWI-I, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Ex Parte Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.