Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Briscoe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1883No. 10,341PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Speneer Circuit Court,

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was an action to recover possession of land and damages for detaining it.

The parties submitted the cause to the court for trial upon an amended complaint. Such a submission waives an issue,, and the pleading not answered is regarded as denied. Cogswell v. State, ex rel., 65 Ind. 1; Kirkpatrick v. Alexander, 60 Ind. 95.

The court found for the plaintiffs, with $20 damages. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, judgment Was rendered on the finding, and the defendant appealed. He assigns as error the overruling of the motion for a new trial. The reasons for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Musselman v. ManlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Carr v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Cogswell v. State ex rel. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Dobbins v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pitcher v. DoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Citizens Bank v. BolenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Marsh v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Jewett v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API